Behavioral
patterns in the species Christiano hypocritus
Luke 7:36- 8:3
A pastor was visiting with a man at a local store when he discovered
that the fellow did not attend any church. He politely invited the guy to
visit his congregation.
“I’m not going to your church,” the man replied, stubbornly. “There
are too many hypocrites there.”
“Hey, don’t worry about that,” said the pastor. “We’ve always got
room for one more.”
To hear some people talk, Sunday morning is the weekly meeting of the
local chapter of the Hypocrites Unlimited. Churches attract hypocrites like
moths drawn to a flame. They are the home turf for pompous folks who put on
a big show of being righteous, in real life, they’re no better than everyone
else, and sometimes worse.
I always find it irritating when I hear an inactive or unchurched
person play the hypocrite card. It is such a tired old excuse--an easy,
thoughtless, judgmental, lazy old cliché.
Yet, there usually is some truth at the root of all clichés—some bit
of reality that got the thing started. So it’s worth asking, is there any
truth at all to the claim that this is a room full of hypocrites?
A word exercise that is both fun and revealing is the “I am, you are,
he is” sequence. It shows how a single character trait can have widely
different meanings, depending on your perspective. Here are a few examples
of how it works:
I am thrifty.
You are cheap.
He is a miserable old tightwad.
I am tenacious.
You are stubborn.
He is a pig-headed fool.
I am outgoing.
You are a big talker
He is a gassy old windbag.
I am laid back.
You lack motivation
He is a lazy bum
I am safety conscious
You are a worrywort
He is a coward
I am thorough and conscientious
You have a tendency to nitpick
He is an obsessive compulsive pain in the neck
Where do you suppose hypocrisy fits into that scheme? A hypocrite is
not something I am; and it’s probably not something you are. It’s something
he is.
I aspire to a high standard
You are pretentious
He is a hypocrite.
Hypocrisy is not something we are likely to see in ourselves. In our
most introspective moments we may recognize the occasional lapse into the
trait of claiming to be what we are not—but we almost always assume
hypocrisy to be a character flaw of others.
The Gospel story for today from Luke, however, forces us to confront
the issue of hypocrisy in the church. Let’s take a closer look at the story:
A Pharisee named Simon
invites Jesus to dinner. This is interesting. Jesus and the Pharisees
don’t run in the same social circles. For the most part, Pharisees don’t
like Jesus at all. Why the invitation? We don’t know for sure, but we’re
suspicious. Not sure this guy’s intentions are honorable.
Regardless, Jesus accepts,
goes to Simon’s house, and sits down to dinner.
When a woman who had lived a sinful life in that town learned that
Jesus was eating there, she showed up, with a vial of expensive perfume.
Hold
on. What is she doing at this private dinner in a Pharisee’s house? How did
the servants let this social misfit get into the house, much less all the
way into the dining room?
According to William Barclay, homes of wealthy people in that time
and part of the world often had an open courtyard, with a well-tended
garden. This was where meals were eaten in nice weather, like a modern day
patio or deck.
The custom was that when a Rabbi was invited for supper, the public
was allowed to come into this courtyard for a while to listen to whatever
wisdom this honored guest consented to offer. That’s how she got in.
As she stood behind him at
his feet weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears. She wiped them
with her hair, kissed them, and poured perfume on them.
Seems to be some awkward logistics here. If she’s behind him, how
does she wet his feet with her tears? Is she crawling on the floor, poking
her head around his legs?
No, despite such famous paintings as DaVinci’s Last Supper, dinner
guests did not sit in chairs around a table. The guest reclined on a sort of
couch. He would lean on his left side, knees bent, feet behind. With Jesus
in that position, the woman cowering behind him could easily get at his feet
and do what was described in the story.
This is a notoriously bad woman. She has a terrible reputation, and
has no idea how to act in polite company. A proper Jewish woman of the time
never appeared in public with loose hair. This woman completely ignores that
bit of etiquette; she wipes his feet with her unbound hair. She doesn’t
understand boundaries. She has no social graces—what she is doing is way out
of line.
When Simon the Pharisee saw
this, he muttered, “If this man were really a prophet, he would know who is
touching him and what kind of woman she is—that she is a sinner.”
Just as we suspected. This was not a gracious invitation that Simon
offered out of friendship or courtesy or a desire to learn more. Simon is a
skeptic. He doesn’t say, “Jesus, why are you putting up with this?” He says,
“Hah, I knew it. He isn’t a prophet. He isn’t who he claims to be. Look at
that phony disgrace himself by coming in contact with this lowlife.”
Not a surprising comment from a Pharisee. After all, the whole point
of a Pharisee’s existence was to honor God by separating himself from all
that was sinful and impure, and he took this to mean separating himself from
all people who were sinful and impure.
It was a noble goal in a way, I guess. But in order to separate
yourself from the sinful, you have to divide people into the worthy and the
unworthy. You have to exalt yourself, put yourself in the category of the
worthy, and you have to reject anyone who is not up to your standards. You
have to set yourself up as better than others.
The reason the Pharisees had such trouble with Jesus is because Jesus
preached a totally different vision of God. God does not look to skim off
the best of humanity and shun the dregs who don’t measure up; God cares for
and desires to save all of God’s creatures.
Jesus makes this point in two stages: First, he makes a personal
appeal to Simon’s learned, rational nature. “Tell me, Simon. Two men owed
money to a lender. One owed two years wages, the other owed a tenth of that
amount. Neither could pay their debt, so the lender canceled both debts.
Which of them will love him more?
Simon sees the point that Jesus is trying to make, but he’s kind of
resentful about it. Instead of just answering, “The one who had the bigger
debt cancelled,” he says, grudgingly, “I suppose the one what had the bigger
debt cancelled.”
He doesn’t like what he hears. The story isn’t about the good guy
with no debts and the bad guy with enormous debt. It is about two debtors.
Jesus just lumped Simon in with that unclean woman, even though he is so far
out of her league that it’s not funny. Worse yet, in this story, this loser
of a woman comes out ahead. She gets the closer relationship with God.
Jesus is stating an obvious truth: it’s hard to love someone when you
don’t need anything they have to offer. It is impossible to love someone if
their existence doesn’t affect you one way or another.
The problem for Pharisees is that they achieve righteousness on their
own. According to their rules, if they do it right, they don’t need God for
anything. If you don’t need anything God has to offer, you don’t love God.
And if you don’t love God, then it’s silly to make such a big show out of
loving God.
It is the height of hypocrisy.
I don’t know that there is a church member of any Christian
denomination who would have the audacity to say that he or she does not need
God. But sometimes we can give the impression that we don’t need God very
much. And we don’t have much time or patience for those who do.
It’s especially true when it comes to worship. It’s easy to get the
attitude that we are the ones trying to worship God the right way, and we
don’t have much tolerance for those who can’t get it right. When we do that,
we become Simon the Pharisee, looking down his nose at the woman who,
despite her ineptness, really, desperately needed Jesus.
Simon is a hypocrite, and Jesus can prove it. The Pharisee has set
himself up as the good person—the one who honors God, and with whom God
should be pleased. Simon cannot imagine that anyone would question this
truth.
But Jesus points out a few things that Simon has overlooked.
According to Barclay, in this social setting, there were three accepted ways
of showing respect to a distinguished guest:
1) The host greeted the guest by placing his hand on the guest’s
shoulder and gave him the kiss of peace.
2) The host had a servant wash the feet of the guest to clean them
from the dirt of the open roads.
3) A pinch or a drop of a sweet-smelling incense was placed on the
guest’s head.
That was how one showed respect and consideration for others. Simon
the Pharisee, the good person, the one who knows the rules and honors God,
and with whom God should be pleased, didn’t do any of these things. The
misfit who walked in the door uninvited, did.
“You did not give me water for my feet,” says Jesus. “She washed my
feet with her tears. You did
not give me the customary kiss of respect; she has not stopped kissing my
feet. You did not anoint me with incense; she who could hardly afford it,
has done so lavishly.
“So Simon, if you can’t even manage the basic courtesies of respect,
just what is it that makes you better, more deserving of God’s favor?”
The question is: who are we supposed to identify with in this story?
The sinful lowlife who doesn’t know any social boundaries? Or the smug phony
who pretends to God’s gift to mankind? That’s a tough choice.
Which is exactly the point. The Pharisees set up a hierarchy, a
separation of the good people from the bad, of God’s people from those who
don’t measure up. Jesus says that sort of judgment isn’t ours to make,
because, frankly, we’re not very good at it. We tend to be just a little
biased in favor of ourselves.
After all, I aspire to a high standard
You are pretentious
And he is a hypocrite.
The lesson of this encounter is that God is not impressed with
individuals, or churches, or nations, who claim to be more godly than their
neighbors.
As the Bible reminds us that “All have fallen short of the glory of
God.”
When my uncle, who died last year, was a brand new pastor, just out
of seminary, he found himself having to preside at a church service at which
the elite members of the church and community were gathered. Famous people,
learned scholars, local celebrities, and great leaders.
Someone asked him if he felt intimidated by the prospect of preaching
to such an audience.
“No,” he said. “They’re all sinners.”
We come to church not to separate ourselves from the sinners, but to
take our place among them. We take our place among the people who recognize
that we need God. We come into the presence of God shoulder to shoulder with
sinners, but when we ask God to have mercy on us, we do so with our eyes
straight ahead, on no one else.
We come into this house of worship knowing that we need God, and so
do the people who surround us, and the details do not matter. God is here
for us and for the person next to us, and for the person who is afraid to
walk through our door of our church for fear of being condemned. God offers
to be most present for those in the greatest need.
Come all you who are weary and carrying heavy burdens, and I will
give you rest.
All who are carrying
heavy burdens. All.